Legal Opinion

Thalman v. Barbour

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1854PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Barbour, Shaw and Buell sued Thalmcm *179and Evans in assumpsit upon a note for the payment of 2,000 dollars. The general issue and four special pleas were pleaded. The second, third and fourth led to issues of fact. To the fifth a demurrer was sustained. The cause was submitted to the Court for trial upon the issues of fact. The Court found for the plaintiffs, and judgment was given on the finding of the Court.

The fifth plea alleges that after the execution of the note sued on, the defendants assigned to the plaintiffs a title-bond for a certain lot in the city of Indimiapolis, valued at 1,800…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shanklin v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Mendenhall v. LenwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1839

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vogel v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Durbin v. Northwestern Scraper Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Jones v. KnaussNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1880
  4. Huggins v. TinsmanIndiana Superior Court · 1873
  5. Kellog ex rel. Monroe v. BokeePennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API