Vogel v. Harris
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Allen Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
Appellees’ counsel contend that the evidence is not in the record on the motion for a new trial, and support their contention by a vigorous argument.
The record shows that a motion for a new trial was filed on the 30th day of Januaiy, 1885, and was overruled on that, day. No time was immediately asked in which to file a bill of exceptions, or to embrace the ruling on the motion in a bill. The ruling was directly followed by a motion for a venire de novo. This motion was overruled, whereupon the appellant secured the following entry to be made : “ To which judgment the defendants further…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- DeHaven v. DeHavenIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Mendenhall v. LenwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
- Williams v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Irons v. WoodfillIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Rose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Osburn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Henry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
- Rondinelli v. BowdenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.