Kellog ex rel. Monroe v. Bokee
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the CourtHarlan, C.J.
This is a suit by a non-resident of the Slate to the use of a resident of the State, and the question now raised is whether the rule security for costs should be made absolute against the non-resident legal plaintiff, notwithstanding the presence of the resident equitable plaintiff, who under our statute, Code P. G. L., Art. 21, Sec. 8, is liable for costs as if he were the legal plaintiff.
It was decided in Selby vs. Clayton, 7 Gill 241, 243, upon objection to the competency of a witness at a time when interest, disqualified, that the legal plaintiff was incompetent as a witness because he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex parte JemisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Thalman v. BarbourIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
- Ten Broeck v. ReynoldsNew York Supreme Court · 1856
- Zimmerman v. Mendenhall, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1840