Legal Opinion
United States v. Lissette Christina Nukida
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 26, 1993No. 92-50234PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Chief Judge:
The government appeals from a judgment of the district court dismissing five counts of a sixteen count indictment charging that Nukida tampered with consumer products affecting interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1365(a). In granting Nukida’s Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b) motion to dismiss, the district court concluded that the products allegedly tampered with did not then affect interstate commerce, and therefore it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. The government contends the district court exceeded its authority by ruling on the interstate…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Donald H. Albrecht, and Joanne Albrecht v. William S. LundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- United States v. Ruben Alfonso and Feli GomezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Katherine PappadopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. David Phillips, United States of America v. David PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Brian Edward RatiganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.