Legal Opinion

United States v. Cruz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 10, 2009No. 07-30384PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Chief Judge KOZINSKI.

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

At first glance, there appears to be something odd about a court of law in a diverse nation such as ours deciding whether a specific individual is or is not “an Indian.”1 Yet, given the long and complex relationship between the government of the United States and the sovereign tribal nations within its borders, the criminal jurisdiction of the federal government often turns on precisely this question — whether a particular individual “counts” as an Indian — and it is this question that we address once again…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. Samir BenamorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. FlyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. StymiestCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. CroweCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Mark PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API