Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Wilson v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 13, 1941No. 27937PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.
The parties to this appeal agree that it presents but one question for decision:
“Is an unemployed worker prosecuting an appeal to the superior court of the county of his residence from an order of the commissioner of the division of unemployment compensation and placement wherein he has been disqualified from receiving benefits claimed, required to pay the county clerk’s docket fees as a condition precedent to filing his notice of appeal under the terms and provisions of the unemployment compensation act?”
The answer to the question lies in the proper construction to be placed upon a portion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arnett v. State, ex rel. DonohueIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- McKnight v. HodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Chamberlin v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Olson v. HeisenOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Nathan v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HouckWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Associated Grocers, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Knappett v. LockeWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Adjustment Department of Olympia Credit Bureau, Inc. v. AyerWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Kane v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.