Legal Opinion

Associated Grocers, Inc. v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1990No. 55686-5PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

— This case involves the basic question whether the business and occupation tax, RCW 82.04.270(2), allowing a tax exemption to distributors, but not to wholesalers, is invalid. We answer that it is.

The State of Washington appeals from a judgment of the Thurston County Superior Court awarding to Respondent Associated Grocers, Inc. (Associated) a refund of $9,938,529, plus interest, in business and occupation taxes. The trial court held that an exemption under RCW 82.04-.270(2) violated Associated's rights under the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Board of Commissioners for Yakima CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. National Can Corp. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Bond v. BurrowsWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. McKnight v. HodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Morris v. BlakerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sharp v. Caterpillar, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  4. American National Can Corp. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Lane v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API