Associated Grocers, Inc. v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
— This case involves the basic question whether the business and occupation tax, RCW 82.04.270(2), allowing a tax exemption to distributors, but not to wholesalers, is invalid. We answer that it is.
The State of Washington appeals from a judgment of the Thurston County Superior Court awarding to Respondent Associated Grocers, Inc. (Associated) a refund of $9,938,529, plus interest, in business and occupation taxes. The trial court held that an exemption under RCW 82.04-.270(2) violated Associated's rights under the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Board of Commissioners for Yakima CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- National Can Corp. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Bond v. BurrowsWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- McKnight v. HodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Morris v. BlakerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Sharp v. Caterpillar, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
- American National Can Corp. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Lane v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.