Arnett v. State, ex rel. Donohue
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom Howard Superior Oourt; B. F. Harness, Judge. Mandamus by tbe State of Indiana, on the relation of Michael Donohue, against William H. Arnett, as controller of the City of Kokomo. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Gillett, T.
In attempting to secure a reversal of the judgment of the court below, appellant contends (1) that the act of February 28, 1897 and the amendment of 1901 (Acts 1897, p. 90, Acts 1901, p. 21, §3717 et seq. Burns 1901), providing for a metropolitan police force in certain cities of the State, are unconstitutional; and (2) that said *182acts are repealed by an act concerning municipal corporations approved March 6, 1905 (Acts 1905, p. 219, §3462 et seq. Burns 1905). nance of peace and quiet and the .suppression of crime and immorality are matters of general interest, and to the attainment…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- The People v. . Simeon DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. LloydIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Sarlls, City Clerk v. State, Ex Rel.Indiana Supreme Court · 1929
- State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- State Ex Rel. Standard Oil Co. v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.