Legal Opinion

Woollen v. Whitacre

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1883No. 10,793PublishedCited by 32 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

— Suit upon a promissory note, payable at tne First National Bank of Indianapolis, alleged to have *503Been executed by the appellee to James B. Drake, and assigned to the appellant, by endorsement, for value, before maturity. The appellee answered, under oath, denying the •execution of the note. Trial by jury; verdict for appellee; judgment on verdict over appellant’s motion for a new trial. The only error assigned by the appellant is that the court below erred in overruling his motion for a new trial.

At the trial the appellant made the proper request for the court to give the jury the following…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glenn v. State ex rel. CloreIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Nelson v. VorceIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Pratt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Starret v. BurkhalterIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Works v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Anderson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hess v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Cline v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Unruh v. State ex rel. BaumIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API