Legal Opinion

Prime v. Squier

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1925No. 23081PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shepherd, District Judge.

Though he had been solicited by Squier for more than .a year, Prime refused to buy stock in the Onahman Iron Company until the former agreed in writing to return the purchase price, less dividends, if upon inspection he was not entirely satisfied that the property was as he had been led to believe. Then he bought 1,250 shares at $3 a share, paying. $3,750 for the block. Within the time agreed upon, as extended, he visited the mine and was not satisfied. He immediately so reported to Squier, and, having asked in vain for the return of his money, he tendered back the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ballou v. SherwoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bowman v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Moore v. MarkelNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Prime v. SquierNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. J. H. Teasdale Commission Co. v. KecklerNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Swanson v. MadsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Personal Finance Co. v. HynesNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Selig v. Wunderlich Contracting CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Langdon v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Aron v. Mid-Continent Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API