Legal Opinion
Gabri v. County of Niagara
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas P. Flaherty, J.
This motion to discontinue counterclaims presents the separate question of whether an attorney can represent both the driver and his passenger in connection with an automobile accident. Discontinuance is granted on the conditions set forth in the order hereon and counsel, who initially represented both the driver and his passenger but now represents only the passenger, is directed to withdraw from the representation of the passenger also.
*624On the court-ordered date for commencement of the jury trial of this action the defendants County of Niagara…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cardinale v. GolinelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In re KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- In re the Estate of WeinstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re HofAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of Re v. Kornstein Veisz & WexlerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Gustafson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Abreu v. AlvarezDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Franklin Fernelis Perez Jimenez, Antonio Polanco, and Carlos Andres Pena Tavarez v. Future Equipment Inc., Wilner Mondor, and Michal’s Quality Transportation Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026