In re Marcus
District Court, S.D. New York
In the matter of Morris Marcus and Emilius W. Scherr, bankrupts. On application for discharge.
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, District Judge.
[1] Under the specifications of a false oath, I do not think it of any consequence that no jury would in fact convict Marcus of perjury on the testimony at the first meeting; thé sole question is whether the bankrupt knowingly and fraudulently made a false oath in any proceeding in bankruptcy, and whether this is proved clearly and substantially to the satisfaction of this court. I cannot agree with the learned master that it is in the least material that the bankrupt subsequently corrects a false oath by telling the truth, except in so far as it throws light upon what…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re SchachterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1909
- In re IdzallDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1899
- In re AlvordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1905
- In re BrodDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1909
- In re GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re HodgeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1913
- Sheinberg v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- Sherwood Shoe Co. v. WixCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
- In re SchiffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1925
- In re HindinDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.