Legal Opinion
Watson v. UnumProvident Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 19, 2002No. CIV.AMD 01-1316PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Valerie Watson (“Watson”), brought this action against defendant, Un-umProvident Corporation (“Unum”), pursuant to the Employees Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), seeking reinstatement of long-term disability benefits which she alleges were wrongfully terminated by Unum. Jurisdiction is exercised pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332.
Now pending are Unum’s Motion to Remand and for Stay and the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. I have carefully reviewed the parties’ submissions, and no…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Laser v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Paul Revere Life Insurance v. JafariDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Buchanan v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Buchanan v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Skinder v. Federal Express Long Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021