Legal Opinion

Skinder v. Federal Express Long Term Disability Plan

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided April 12, 2021No. 5:19-cv-00153Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-CV-00153-KDB-DCK DIANE SKINDER, Plaintiff, v. ORDER FEDERAL EXPRESS LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Defendant. IN THIS MATTER Plaintiff Diane Skinder contends that Defendant Federal Express Long Term Disability Plan (the “Plan”) violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) in September 2018 by terminating long-term disability benefits that she had been receiving under the Plan since 2004. Now before the Court are the Parties’ cross Motions for Summary…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Christina Jacobs v. N.C. Admin. Office of the CourtsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  5. Rossignol v. VoorhaarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API