Legal Opinion

Hobart-Farrell Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Klayman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 8, 1939PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

This is a petition in equity to obtain the benefit of a surety company bond given as security under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 149, § 29 (St. 1935, c. 472, § 2), to the respondent town by a contractor for the repair of a schoolhouse. The contractor owes the petitioner for labor furnished and materials used in installing a heating system in the schoolhouse. The statute cited provides that "to obtain the benefit of such security the claimant shall file in the office of the . . . town clerk a sworn statement of his claim” within a certain time. The only question is, whether such a statement was filed.

Th…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. LombardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Del Vecchio v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. New York Life Insurance v. GamerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Tyrrell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Epstein v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Commonwealth v. PauleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. CrosscupMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Payne v. R. H. White Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API