Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Amazon

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 3, 2025No. 17/24Published

1Opinion of the Court

Estefany Martinez v. Amazon.com Services LLC, Misc. No. 17, September Term, 2024. Opinion by Biran, J. LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT – MARYLAND WAGE AND HOUR LAW & MARYLAND WAGE PAYMENT AND COLLECTION LAW – The Supreme Court of Maryland held that the doctrine of de minimis non curat lex, as described in Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Company,

328 U.S. 680

(1946), applies to claims brought under the Maryland Wage and Hour Law, Md. Code Ann., Lab. & Empl. (“LE”) § 3-401 et seq. (1991, 2016 Repl. Vol.), and the Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law, LE § 3-501 et seq. United States District Court for…

2Cases cited39 opinions

Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.