Legal Opinion
Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 27, 2014No. 12-417PublishedCited by 262 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
**
The question before us is the meaning of the phrase "changing clothes" as it appears in the Fair Labor Standards Act of *874 1938, 52 Stat. 1060 , as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (2006 ed. and Supp. V).
I. Facts and Procedural History
Petitioner Clifton Sandifer, among others, filed suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act against respondent United *223 States Steel Corporation in the District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiffs in this putative collective action are a group of current or former employees of respondent's steelmaking facilities. As relevant here, they seek…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Burrage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by262 opinions
- Encino Motorcars, LLC v. NavarroSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- New Prime Inc. v. OliveiraSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Southwest Airlines Co. v. SaxonSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Kesha Williams v. Stacey KincaidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Mary Chambers v. DC (EN BANC)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
257 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.