Legal Opinion

Wolford v. Tankersley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1985No. 13764PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Chief Justice.

In 1974, the plaintiffs-respondents, Mr. and Mrs. Empey, decided to sell four and one-half acres of their land. They retained Mr. Wolford, as their real estate agent. The defendants-appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Tankersley, purchased the property but three years later a dispute arose over the purchase price.

The events leading up to the dispute began when the Empeys attempted to sell a portion of their property for $18,000. The Tankersleys saw the property and testified that the Empeys told them to contact the Empeys’ real estate agent, Mr. Wolford. After talking with Mr.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Mitchell v. SiqueirosIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hoffman v. SV Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Smith v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Vanderford Co., Inc. v. KnudsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bakker v. Thunder Spring-Wareham, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Bates v. SeldinIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. DBSI/TRI v. v. BenderIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Heinze v. BauerIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API