Legal Opinion
Martin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 16, 2011No. Civ. 10-3594 (RHK/FLN)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On August 21, 2008, the home of Plaintiffs Richard and Patricia Martin (“the Martins”) was significantly damaged in a fire. They filed a claim with their insurer, Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”), which denied it. The Martins then commenced the instant action, seeking to recover the proceeds of their policy. State Farm now moves for summary judgment, based on the Martins’ ostensible failure to comply with several policy provisions. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Weitz Co., LLC v. Lloyd's of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Wingate v. Gage County School Dist., No. 34Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Carraher v. Target Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Weber v. TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INS. CO.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011