Legal Opinion
Carraher v. Target Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 19, 2007No. 06-3857PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.
Richard “Tom” Carraher appeals from the entry of summary judgment on his age discrimination claim against Target Corporation. Carraher alleges that Target terminated his employment in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn.Stat. §§ 363A.01-.41. On appeal, Carraher contends that the district court1 erred in its pretext analysis and did not view the evidence in the light most favorable to him. We affirm.
I
Target hired Carraher, then 56 years old, as a recruiter in June 2003. In…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- James F. HUTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Weitz Co., LLC v. Lloyd's of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Tusing v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Fitzgerald v. Action, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Larry R. Hedlund v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Doe v. Department of Veterans Affairs of USCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.