Legal Opinion
Hyman v. Cornell University
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 9, 2018No. 17-2631Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
17-2631 Hyman v. Cornell University UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Biro v. Condé NastCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- LAWRENCE STOREY, — v. CELLO HOLDINGS, L.L.C., CELLO MUSIC AND FILM SYSTEMS, INC., — HERRICK, FEINSTEIN LLP AND ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v. Empresa Naviera Santa S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- L-Tec Electronics Corporation v. Cougar Electronic Organization, Inc. Sol Mayer and Dan Reich, Individually and D/B/A Cougar Electronic OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.