Legal Opinion

Bridwell v. Davis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 6, 1943No. 4-7183PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcFaddin, J.

This appeal involves two lots, each with a different line of title. In addition, there was a request for a nunc pro tunc order regarding each. lot.

Appellant initiated this suit in the chancery court by filing against appellee a complaint entitled, “Suit to Set Aside Deeds”; and in that pleading appellant alleged that by two separate foreclosure proceedings in the Cleburne chancery court (one against C. Frauenthal and the other against R. E. Chance) and by commissioner’s sales and deeds in said foreclosure, appellant became the owner of the two lots involved in this litigation, one being in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Petition of BreedingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Simpson v. TalbotSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  3. Moon v. Georgia State Savings AssociationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. Stade v. BergSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Miller v. SeilerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Francis v. Protective Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Brown v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Dunn v. Phoenix Village, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1963
  4. Kimble v. WilleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1951
  5. Holt Bonding Co., Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API