Legal Opinion

Kimble v. Willey

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided June 22, 1951No. Civ. 353PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEMLEY, District Judge.

This cause having been submitted to the Court upon the pleadings filed herein, the stipulations of the parties, the depositions of witnesses and exhibits thereto, and written briefs; and the Court being well and fully advised, doth make the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Comment thereon:

I. Findings of Fact

1

Plaintiff is a citizen of Mississippi; defendant is a citizen of Tennessee; the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, exceeds the sum of $3,000. The action is local in nature and is brought to quiet title to certain lands located…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Arkansas v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Hart v. SternbergSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Wallace v. DriverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  4. Terral v. BrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Waller v. DansbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kimble v. WilleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  2. Bryant v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1954
  3. Rubin Bryant and Andrew Kennedy v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Company, a Corporation, and United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  4. Kimble v. Anderson-Tully Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1955
  5. Ward v. HarwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API