Inger Interiors v. Peralta
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, P.J.
The defendant-customers appeal from a judgment granting the plaintiff-decorator’s claim for an allegedly unpaid account balance. Contrary to' the customers’ contention, the trial court reasonably found that the customers had agreed to pay the challenged balance. However, undisputed evidence established that the decorator had accepted the customers’ proposed settlement for this controversy. Hence, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and enter final judgment dismissing the decorator’s claim.
I
The trial court’s small claims referee heard the evidence on the plaintiff-decorator’s claim and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Platt v. Penetryn System, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- Kirk Williams Co. v. Six Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.