Legal Opinion

Elliott v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 9345PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

— The appellant, who was keeping a drug store, but had no license to sell intoxicating liquors in quantities less than a quart, was indicted, convicted and fined seventy dollars for a sale made in violation of the license law. The evidence is in the record, andno question is, or can be, made of the appellant''s guilt as charged; but we are asked to reverse the judgment because, as is claimed, the fine is excessive, and because of alleged error of the court in overruling the peremptory challenge of the appellant to certain jurors.

The amount of the fine was within the discretion of the jury,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Balbo v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Guetig v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Scranton v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Coryell v. StoneIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Lohman v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1848

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Klink v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Lewis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Shields v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API