Legal Opinion

GENERAL ACC. FIRE & LIFE ASSUR. CORPORATION v. Clark

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1929No. 5688PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an action at law, brought by appellees, husband and wife, injured third persons, to- recover on a contract of indemnity (hereinafter referred to as the policy) issued by the appellant (hereinafter referred to as the insurance company) to George Ross, a taxicab driver, to cover his liability for accidents arising out of bis operation of a certain Paige sedan automobile. Appellees recovered a joint judgment in the superior court of the state of Arizona in and for the county of Yavapai against George Ross for $12,000 compensatory damages and $3,000 punitive damages.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith Stage Co. v. EckertArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Pape v. Red Cab Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926
  3. Dean v. MarshallNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Morrell v. LalondeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1923
  5. Arizona Mutual Auto Insurance v. BernalArizona Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anthony D. Duke v. Joel Hoch, Home Indemnity Company, Garnishee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Universal Underwriters Insurance Corp. v. ReynoldsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Audrey Morris, of the Last Will and Testament of Florence Virginia Day Utermoehlen v. Western States Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  4. Buckley v. OremIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Clougherty v. Royal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API