People ex rel. Mulford v. Turner
California Supreme Court
This was an application for a writ of mandamus to the district judge of the eighth judicial district, to command him to 'vacate an order striking the names of the relators from the roll of the court as attorneys. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Bennett, J.
Application for a writ of 'mandamus. At a term of the district court of the eighth judicial district, held in and for the county of Tuba, on the tenth day of June last, the following order was made :—“ Whereas Messrs. “ Field, Goodwin, and liulford, having set at defiance the au- “ thority of this court, and having vilified the court, and de- “ nounced its proceedings, the said Field, Goodwin, and Mul- “ ford are hereby, by order of the court-, expelled from the bar “ of the same.”
An application is now made for ahvrit of mandamus to require the court to vacate the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
- Ex Parte BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- United States v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1795
- McCluny v. SillimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Hustedt v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.