Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Texas Instruments, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 25, 1982No. Appeal No. 81-23Published

1DissentNies, Judge

The Government’s Alternative Classification Under Item 740.38, TSUS

I respectfully dissent from that portion of the court’s opinion which affirms the Court of International Trade’s rejection, on a motion for summary judgment, of the Government’s proposed alternative classification of the subject watches and modules 1 under item 740.38, TSUS.

The court below held that TI had met its dual burden of proving that the original classification was incorrect and that TI’s claimed provision was correct. The court also held that the Government failed to meet its burden of proving that classification…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Kennett-Murray Corporation v. John E. BoneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. General Motors Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. Bouchard v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  5. Ditbro Pearl Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API