Legal Opinion
Procter & Gamble Co. v. QuantifiCare Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 19, 2017No. Case No. 17-CV-03061-LHKPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Procter & Gamble Co. ("P&G") and Canfield Scientific, Inc. ("Canfield") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed a patent infringement suit against Defendant QuantifiCare Inc. ("QuantifiCare"). Plaintiffs allege that QuantifiCare infringes claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,571,003 ("the '003 Patent"). Before the Court is QuantifiCare's Motion to Dismiss, which contends that the asserted claims of the '003 Patent fail to recite patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. ECF No. 35 ("Mot."). Having considered the submissions of the parties, the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Shakur v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- MyMail, Ltd. v. ooVoo, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- FaceToFace Biometrics, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
- Genc v. Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLCDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 2023
- Genc v. Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLCDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 2022
- Jaguar Land Rover Ltd. v. Bentley Motors Ltd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.