Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Princeton Economics International Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 27, 2001No. Docket Nos. 00-6076, 00-6156PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.
Defendant-appellant Martin Armstrong appeals from a January 14, 2000 order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Owen, /.) holding him in contempt and ordering him detained him until he agrees to deliver a variety of items included in “turn-over” orders issued by the district court on September 13, 1999 and January 7, 2000.
The district court ordered Armstrong to turn over to appellee Alan M. Cohen, court-appointed receiver for defendants…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- New York State National Organization for Women v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
3Cited by7 opinions
- Armstrong v. GuccioneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission, Alan M. Cohen, Receiver-Appellee v. Martin A. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Livecchi v. GordonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.