Legal Opinion

Weckert v. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoBEIDE, J.

The facts, as detailed by plaintiff with some corroboration on the part of the witnesses introduced by him as to the repairs, are about as follows:

On November 24, 1926, plaintiff bought the truck, turning in a Dodge roadster at $350, and on the 26th took it home. It had a slight knock when he bought it, which defendant assured him was only a spark knock. Plaintiff drove the car to Sherwood and around his home, and finding the knock getting worse, on December 4, 1926, took it to Laringe’s garage at Sherwood to ascertain the cause of the knock and found two or three bearings were entirely gone.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kingman & Co. v. StoddardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
  2. McDonough v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Van Natta v. SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Russakov v. the McCarthy Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Moran v. TuckerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Barnes-Manley Wet Wash Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Barnes-Manley Wet Wash Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  3. Bridgmon v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Bridgmon v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API