Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bridgmon v. Walker

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1959Published

1DissentO’Connell, J.

This is an action brought against J. J. Walker, John P. Celoria and George B. Rusehka to recover damages resulting from alleged fraudulent representations made by the defendants in connection with the sale of a house to the plaintiff, Betty R. Bridgmon, and Raymond D. Bridgmon. From a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs, the defendants Walker and Celoria appeal. In consideration of the payment of $900 by the defendant Rusehka, the plaintiffs covenanted not to proceed further against him and he is, therefore, not a party on this appeal. Although Raymond D. Bridgmon’s interest in this…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Nash v. Minnesota Title Insurance & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Wills v. Nehalem Coal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Mack v. . LattaNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API