Legal Opinion

State v. Siers

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 29, 2010No. 63697-9-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 After State v. Powell,1 the State must include in the information any aggravating factor it intends to prove for purposes of seeking an exceptional sentence above the standard range. The question in this case is: what remedy is available to a defendant when the State presents an uncharged aggravator to the jury — is it merely to strike the exceptional sentence if one is imposed? Or must the aggravating factor be treated as an essential element of the underlying crime, so that the charge on that count is viewed as fatally deficient for omitting it? We agree with appellant that he is…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SiersWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of CrowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Personal Restraint Petition Of Tommy Lee Crow, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. State v. SiersWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. SiersWashington Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API