Legal Opinion

Mead v. Nacey

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 4, 1975No. 2 CA-CIV 1641PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KRUCKER, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered against Chester R. Mead, individually, providing that he pay the plaintiffs, Robert E. Nacey and Barbara M. Nacey, the sum of $12,160.00. Appellants also appeal from a denial of their claim against the third-party defendants, cross-appellees, Nicholas Johnoff and Florence M. John-off, real estate brokers, and Cynthia J. Van Auken, an agent for Johnoff Realty, for breach of fiduciary duty.

This action arises out of a refusal by appellants to perform a written agreement providing for the purchase of a lot in El Encanto Estates.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Porter v. EyerArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Aztec Film Productions v. Tucson Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Blech v. BlechCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Thornton v. SOUTHWEST FLOUR & FEED COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tanner Companies v. Arizona State Land DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Donahoe v. MarstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Fleming v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. State ex rel. McDougall v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Children's Services Division v. CashCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API