Legal Opinion

Kaiman v. Teledyne Instruments, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 10, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00100Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Joshua Kaiman, : Case No. 1:22-cv-100 : Plaintiff, : : Judge Susan J. Dlott v. : : Order Granting in Part and Denying Teledyne Instruments, Inc., et al., : in Part Motion to Dismiss : Defendants. : : This matter is before the Court on Defendants’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. (Doc. 7.) Plaintiff has filed a Response in Opposition, and Defendants have filed a Reply. (Docs. 9, 10.) For the reasons that follow, Defendants’s Motion will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND A. Facts…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Michael E. Kleiber v. Honda of America Mfg., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Joanne Hedrick v. Western Reserve Care System and Forum HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API