Kaiman v. Teledyne Instruments, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Joshua Kaiman, : Case No. 1:22-cv-100 : Plaintiff, : : Judge Susan J. Dlott v. : : Order Granting in Part and Denying Teledyne Instruments, Inc., et al., : in Part Motion to Dismiss : Defendants. : : This matter is before the Court on Defendants’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. (Doc. 7.) Plaintiff has filed a Response in Opposition, and Defendants have filed a Reply. (Docs. 9, 10.) For the reasons that follow, Defendants’s Motion will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND A. Facts…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Michael E. Kleiber v. Honda of America Mfg., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Joanne Hedrick v. Western Reserve Care System and Forum HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.