Legal Opinion

Suh v. Pingo Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1987No. S-1247, S-1259, 3188PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

MOORE, Justice.

In Cesar v. Alaska Workmen’s Compensation Board, 383 P.2d 805 (Alaska 1963), we determined the manner by which scheduled permanent partial disability awards were to be computed under AS 23.30.190. We reconsidered that determination in Providence Washington Insurance Co. v. Grant, 693 P.2d 872 (Alaska 1985), and concluded that Cesar was erroneous. We overruled Cesar, with the result that awards for permanent partial disability would be increased in some cases. The question now on appeal is the extent to which Grant applies retroactively. We hold that Grant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kaatz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Arctic Structures, Inc. v. WedmoreAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Judd v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. American Stevedores, Inc., and Michigan Mutual Liability Insurance Company v. Vincent Salzano, and Director, Office of Workers Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. National Independent Coal Operator's Ass'n v. BrennanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fairbanks North Star Borough School District v. CriderAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Haynes v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Gunter v. Kathy-O-EstatesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Tipton v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Jonathan v. Doyon Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API