Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Jonathan v. Doyon Drilling, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1995No. S-5918PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Keith Jonathan was severely injured in the course of his employment with Doyon Drilling, Inc. on February 12, 1988. Doyon, through its insurer, Alaska National Insurance Company (collectively Doyon), began paying him medical and disability benefits. On July 3, 1989, Jonathan’s vocational rehabilitation counselor prepared a rehabilitation report for Doyon relating the efforts made to find Jonathan employment. 1 The report stated that Jonathan expressed an unwillingness to look for work. On August 9, 1989, Doyon filed a Notice of Controversion,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Benner v. WichmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kulawik v. ERA Jet AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Suh v. Pingo Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Nelson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Monzulla v. Voorhees Concrete CuttingAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. ARCTEC Services v. CummingsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Tipton v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API