Legal Opinion

Broch v. Broch

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1932PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

A decree of divorce was granted Mrs. Broch by the Circuit Judge and she was given the custody of a six-year-old girl child. The Court of Appeals has reversed the case on the facts .and dismissed the suit. By her petition for certiorari, which has been granted and argument heard, the preliminary question is made that the Court of Appeals erred (1) in considering the evidence at all because no motion for a new trial was made in the trial court, and (2) in hearing the case de novo, in disregard of the material evidence rule.

It appears that in his answer, filed December 21, 1929, the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toomey v. AtyoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Choate v. SewellTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Trice v. McGillTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Fonville v. GregoryTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Beatty v. SchenckTennessee Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lingner v. LingnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. BurtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Clardy v. ClardyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  4. Morrell v. Republic Fire Ins. Co. of PittsburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Mitchell v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API