In re M.O., Juvenile
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
Robinson, J.
Father appeals from the trial court’s finding that newborn M.O. was a child in need of care or supervision *385(CHINS). He argues that the court’s findings do not support its conclusion. We affirm.
¶ 2. M.O. was born on December 14, 2014. Mother was twenty-one years old at the time; father was thirty-four. On December 17, 2014, the Department for Children and Families (DCF) filed a petition alleging that M.O. was CHINS. It sought emergency custody of the child. In the accompanying affidavit, a DCF social worker asserted that DCF had received a report from hospital staff expressing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- In re B.R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In re D.D.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Seaway Shopping Center Corp. v. Grand Union Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- First Vermont Bank & Trust Co. v. Village of PoultneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re B.B., B.C., and B.B., JuvenilesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- In re B.C., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- In re B.G., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In re B.G., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In re M.O., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.