In re B.G., Juvenile

Dooley, J.,

¶ 11. concurring. I concur in the majority decision that the trial court could find that B.G. may be adjudicated a child in need of care or supervision (CHINS) under 33 V.S.A. § 5102(3)(A) on the basis that the child was abandoned. I agree that the statute is so broadly written that it covers even a case where the child is being safely and appropriately cared for as arranged by the parent. I am writing this concurrence, as I did in In re M.O., 2015 VT 120, ¶¶ 17-25, 200 Vt. 384, 131 A.3d 738 (Dooley, J., concurring), to point out that the fact that the Department for Children and…