In re B.B., B.C., and B.B., Juveniles

¶ 1. Mother appeals an order concluding that her children were children in need of care or supervision (CHINS) due to educational *246 neglect. On appeal, mother argues that (1) the court erred in not requiring the State to demonstrate that the children's absences were without justification; (2) the evidence does not support the court's finding that missing school caused the children harm; (3) the existence of Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) for the two young children, who were not legally required to attend school, does not support a finding of educational neglect; and (4) the court erred…