Legal Opinion

Cam Vending Service v. Kessler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1964No. Appeal, No. 442PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

The appellant questions the authority of the prothonotary to enter judgment by confession on a note under the Act of February 24, 1806, P. L. 334, as amended by the Act of June 10, 1957, P. L. 281, 12 PS §739, for less than the amount appearing to be due on the face of the instrument. The only evidence of the credit appeared in an “Order for entry of judgment and assessment of damages” filed by the plaintiff with the note.

The Act of 1806 literally authorizes the prothonotary to confess judgment only “for the amount which from the face of the instrument may appear to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lansdowne Bank & Trust Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Dalton v. WillingmyreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Harr, Secy., Etc. v. FurmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Philadelphia Gas Heating Co. v. SandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Morel v. MorelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BarnessDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. H. A. Steen Industries, Inc. v. Richer Communications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Duque v. D'ANGELISSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Anthos v. Nu Aero Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1965
  5. Commonwealth v. Bankes, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Columbia County1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API