Legal Opinion

Combs v. . Brickhouse

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbogden, J.

Does a parol agreement to eliminate drainage ditches, made by the owners of the dominant and servient estates, constitute evidence of an abandonment or relinquishment of a drainage easement imposed upon the servient estate?

An easement is an interest in land, and the creation thereof by grant is governed by the statute of frauds. C. S., 988. Davis v. Robinson, 189 N. C., 589, 127 S. E., 697; Clark v. R. R., 192 N. C., 280, 135 S. E., 26; Gruber v. Eubank, 197 N. C., 280, 148 S. E., 246.

The facts in this case, however, involve the abandonment or relinquishment of an easement rather than the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Davis v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Stevens v. TurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Stevens v. . TurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. M. E. Gruber, Inc. v. EubankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shingleton v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. United States v. Wheeler Tp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Davis v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Miller v. . TeerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Davis v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API