Cardwell v. Clark
New York Supreme Court
Action for partition.
1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.
This is an action for the partition of real property. It was tried before - a jury. • At- the *435conclusion of the trial the court ruled that there were no questions of fact to be submitted to-the jury and reserved decision on the questions of law.
I indicated on the trial that I thought the defendants Macbeth could make no claim to the premises under the alleged deeds from Lawrence V. Husted and Jennie Husted, and I am still of that opinion. It only remains, therefore, to consider the claims of the holders of the several tax leases.
The plaintiff challenges the validity of all these leases upon…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Meigs v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Cromwell v. . MacLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Newman v. . Supervisors of Livingston Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Thompson v. . BurhansNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vlcek v. VlcekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Young v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Young v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928