Legal Opinion
Young v. Southern Pac. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 9, 1928No. 280Published
1Opinion of the Court
25 F.2d 630 (1928)
YOUNG et al.
v.
SOUTHERN PAC. CO.
No. 280.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 9, 1928.
Humes, Buck & Smith, of New York City (Gordon M. Buck, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Dudley F. Phelps, of New York City (Frank M. Swacker, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
These appellees belong to the class of stockholders who sought to intervene in a stockholders' action and who are referred to in Southern Pacific Co. v. Bogert, 250 U. S. 483, 39 S. Ct. 533, 63 L. Ed. 1099, and Bogart…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Galway v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.