Blancett v. Blancett
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHÁVEZ, Justice.
{1} The facts of this ease raise a question about whether extrinsic evidence may be admitted to prove a grantor’s intent in physically delivering an unambiguous deed to a grantee. Defendant-Petitioner Linn Blancett (“Linn”) appeals from an order rescinding and nullifying two deeds that his father, Plaintiff-Respondent Richard Blaneett (“Richard”), physically delivered to Linn’s wife in 1993. In a memorandum opinion upholding the order, the Court of Appeals held that even when a grantor physically delivers an otherwise unambiguous deed to a grantee, extrinsic evidence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Den-Gar Enterprises v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Waters v. BlocksomNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Nosker v. Western Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Vigil v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- King v. Estate of GilbreathDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Lucero v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Lucero v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011