Legal Opinion

Blancett v. Blancett

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2004No. 28,416PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHÁVEZ, Justice.

{1} The facts of this ease raise a question about whether extrinsic evidence may be admitted to prove a grantor’s intent in physically delivering an unambiguous deed to a grantee. Defendant-Petitioner Linn Blancett (“Linn”) appeals from an order rescinding and nullifying two deeds that his father, Plaintiff-Respondent Richard Blaneett (“Richard”), physically delivered to Linn’s wife in 1993. In a memorandum opinion upholding the order, the Court of Appeals held that even when a grantor physically delivers an otherwise unambiguous deed to a grantee, extrinsic evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Den-Gar Enterprises v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Waters v. BlocksomNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Nosker v. Western Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Vigil v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. King v. Estate of GilbreathDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
  2. Lucero v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Lucero v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API