Legal Opinion

People v. Velasquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 2016No. 2013-10793PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cyrulnik, J.), dated November 20, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. A downward departure from a sex offender’s presumptive risk level generally is warranted only where there exists a mitigating factor of a kind or to a degree not otherwise adequately taken into…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. GillottiNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. FryerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. Rocano-QuintunaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. People v. HaimsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  3. People v. LocklearAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. People v. MeadersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. People v. NievesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API