People v. Fryer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Only the defendant’s contention that he was improperly assessed 15 points under risk factor 11 for a history of drug and alcohol abuse on the ground that his more recent history was one of prolonged abstinence is preserved for appellate review (see People v Kyle, 64 AD3d 1177 [2009]; Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 15 [2006]). The defendant’s remaining contentions regarding this risk factor are unpreserved for appellate review since he failed to raise those grounds before the Supreme Court. In any event, the defendant’s contentions are without merit.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. GoossensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. KyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. FernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- People v. WorrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. VelasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. MarshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.