Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Welfare v. Soto

New York Court of Special Session

Decided March 18, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam E. Ringel, J.

This is a motion, made by the defendant in a disputed paternity proceeding, to examine the complainant before trial, with respect to certain items set forth in his notice of motion.

Applications for examinations before trial should be viewed with liberality to prevent surprise at a trial and to make the trial more efficient. (42 West 15th St. Corp. v. Friedman, 208 Misc. 123.)

Examination before trial in litigation today is accepted almost as a matter of course (Marie Dorros, Inc. v. Dorros Bros., 274: App. Div. 11).

Accordingly, the basic issue to be determined here, is whether the Civil…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Commissioner of Public Welfare v. SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Matter of ClausiNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. State ex rel. Mahnke v. KablitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. 42 West 15th Street Corp. v. FriedmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maureen E. O'H. v. Nicholas C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. In re WurtzelSullivan County Children's Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API