Legal Opinion
Bloch v. Prudential-Bache Securities
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 28, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-935PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MENCER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this action are investors who are asserting securities fraud and RICO claims against the defendants. Prudential-Bache Securities has filed a motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations, failure to plead fraud with particularity, failure to allege a pattern of racketeering activity, and failure to state a claim. Finkel, Lefkowitz, Ostrow & Woolridge has filed a motion to dismiss based on failure to plead fraud with particularity and failure to allege a pattern of racketeering. Jeffrey Letwin joined the law firm’s motions.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Craighead v. E.F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Nasdaq Omx Phlx, Inc. v. Pennmont SecuritiesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Craighead v. Hutton & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Elysian Federal Savings Bank v. First Interregional Equity Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Daniel Boone Area School Dist. v. Lehman Brothers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.